In response to this:
Bev said...
I think your next blog should address the no-debate logic. It's crazy out there.
I say this: Not everyone has a BFF with the same first name! But I do. And I will say this Bev Blair--the no debate brouhaha was drama to distract. About the time his campaign manager's enormous retainer from Freddie Mac hit the fan, it was time to fake a "suspension of the campaign."
A sidebar-every once in awhile I think, maybe Barack should have asked Hillary to be his running mate. I think Bill Clinton's comments this week demonstrate why Barack could not ask her and risk the baggage of Bill lurking around the campaign.
How about the WSJ's online version running an ad claiming victory for McCain before he declared that he would debate after all?
9:17 p.m. Friday, September 26, 2008
McCain and Obama are facing off in the debate in Oxford. The moderator asks the two men to look at each other and talk. They are not looking . I don't think they like each other much.
Jim Leherer is trying again to get them to look at each other, but they won't. Maybe it's because debaters are trained to look at the judges and these folks have been practicing for a long time to NOT look at each other.
10:30 p.m.
I don't think I managed the live blogger thing very well. Maybe I could have twittered.
What I know for sure is: McCain didn't manage to ever look at Obama.
What's up with that?
What does that say about McCain?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I don't know what to think about Mccain not looking at Obama during the debate. However, I do know this much, I will not vote for either of these two candidates because they could not directly answer a question during the debate. I will use my vote as a "protest vote" this year and vote for a third party.
David Walker
Post a Comment